Theology – Page 2 – Grace Life Baptist Church

Self-Induced Faith

Written by Jeremy Vanatta on September 2, 2016. Posted in The Gospel, Theology.

There’s a lot of confusion out there when it comes to the word “faith”. Most of it creeps in over time as people become increasingly removed from the biblical concept. Of course, some use the Bible to justify their self-revelatory versions of “faith”. And everyone but atheists (whose “faith” is in “nothing-ness”) seem to have some kind of “faith,” usually affectionately termed “my faith”.

The trouble with these misconceptions of faith is they’re mostly self-induced, meaning faith is treated like something you must drum-up from within, more like an emotion.

So what’s the big problem with self-induced faith?
1. Self-induced faith hijacks the doctrine of sin. It underestimates the seriousness of sin and the holiness of God. We are more wicked than we know; and God is more holy than we can conceive. Human depravity is total. Our mind, will, and emotions are incapable of the righteousness required by God to enter His eternal presence. As Jesus says, “Apart from me you can do nothing” (John 15:5).

2. Self-induced faith hijacks salvation through faith alone in Christ alone. Self-induced “faith” is really “faith in faith”–or more specifically, faith in self. Often, people with self-induced faith talk more about being “spiritual” than having faith because they aren’t keen on historical, propositional truth as recorded in the Bible. The result is a self-induced faith directed toward self while biblical faith is directed toward Jesus. And any faith directed toward the self is by definition a “faith + works” system of salvation that falls short of God’s glory.

3. Self-induced faith hijacks salvation by God’s grace alone. If “faith” is something you must work up in yourself, God’s grace is rendered meaningless. God grace is God’s undeserved favor, meaning no amount of good deeds or self-actualization (aka, “name it and claim it”) can earn God’s grace. You can’t earn that which is un-earnable. Self-induced faith turns biblical faith into “works of the law”.

4. Self-induced faith hijacks the doctrine of perseverance. If faith is something you are primarily responsible for coming up with, then faith is something you are primarily responsible for maintaining. And there is no guarantee that you will keep “the faith”.

Biblical Faith
Biblical faith, on the other hand, acknowledges man’s inability to come to God for salvation on his own because it recognizes the sinfulness of sin and the holiness of God.

Biblical faith acknowledges that man’s only hope is trusting (faithing) in Jesus Christ alone for deliverance from his sin debt to God.

Therefore, biblical faith in Christ alone is the Christian’s only hope of salvation and perseverance because only biblical faith depends on God’s grace. Biblical faith is grace-dependent. In fact, faith is a gift of God’s grace.

Ephesians 2:8–For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God.

Philippians 1:29–For it has been granted to you that for the sake of Christ you should not only believe in him but also suffer for his sake.

We can no more perfectly obey the command to “Believe” than the command of “Do not lie.” Faith must first be granted by God according to His eternal purposes. But self-induced faith turns biblical faith into “works of the law” rather than a gift of grace.

So how do you know you have received the gift of faith? That’s the question people often pose in reaction to salvation by God grace through a faith that is itself a gift of grace. If you are trusting in Christ alone for forgiveness of sins and living out the “obedience of faith” (Rom.1:5; 16:26), then you’ve received His grace.

Sola Fide,
Jeremy Vanatta

Antinomianism: Still Extant and Slippery

Written by Jeremy Vanatta on December 9, 2015. Posted in The Gospel, Theology.

I am recently finishing up an interesting book I wanted to recommend to those interested in the topic of Antinomianism. Mark Jones has written an excellent historical and theological analysis of the subject in his book “Antinomianism: Reformed Theology’s Unwelcome Guest?”

The most significant take away of the book is how the Antinomian view of sanctification claims a high Christology in regards to God’s grace and justification by faith alone yet falls desperately short of the Christo-centric approach to which they claim to hold.

Read it for yourself, and be challenged by its conclusion that justification by faith alone in no way does away with the reality of a grace-fueled sanctification of a faith that works hard to kill indwelling sin and obey God.

Sola Gratia,
Jeremy Vanatta

Confessions

Written by Jeremy Vanatta on August 31, 2011. Posted in The Gospel, Theology.

I am thankful for the kindness of God in allowing me to read Saint Augustine’s Confessions. I can say that it has impacted my understanding of God and of myself as much as any other book that I have ever read (aside from the Bible mind you). I only wish that someone would have clued me into this great treasure many years ago because it would have been helpful in so many spiritual battles.

One of the first things I noticed as I began reading is Augustine’s utter awe of God. Not one sentence in this book spoke of God flippantly. Rather, God was held in the highest esteem, yet it was done without any hint of legalistic rigidity.

There is one thing evident above all others: Augustine had been changed by the sovereign grace of God, by the life-giving Spirit of God. Whereas he was once enslaved to sexual promiscuity and man-centered philosophy, God awakended him to new life. As he sat in a garden contemplating his spiritual state, he heard a voice of a child from a nearby house chanting, “Pick up and read, pick up and read.” So he did, and in the providence of God, Augustine opened to Romans 13:13-14, which said, “Not in riots and drunken parties, not in eroticism and indecencies, not in strife and rivalry, but put on the Lord Jesus Christ and make no provision for the flesh in its lusts.” His often quoted conversion is recorded this way:

“I neither wished nor needed to read further. At once, with the last words of this sentence, it was as if a light of relief from all anxiety flooded into my heart. All the shadows of doubt were dispelled.”

Later in the book Augustine described his conversion this way: “You called and cried out loud and shattered my deafness. You were radiant and resplendent, you put to flight my blindness. You were fragrant, and I drew in my breath and now pant after you. I tasted you, and I feel but hunger and thirst for you. You touched me, and I am set on fire to attain the peace which is yours.”

These kinds of statements in the Confessions about the grace of God in salvation through Jesus Christ bring the Christian reader to a point of worship. It would be hard to imagine how a genuine believer could read such words and be unmoved. To think back and remember how God calls sinners like me out of darkness into spiritual light humbles me and brings me to worship God for His work of salvation. My earnest prayer is that any reader of this article would read the testimony of Augustine and that God would do the same in them. May He turn dark hearts to light! May He turn light hearts to ever brighter lights! May He show every reader that no good thing lies within us, and that we need Him more than our next breath!

Well, time and space would not permit me to share the numerous quotations that set my soul soaring and those that brought me to the depths of the valley, but suffice it to say that this book is worth the read. It takes a little while to get used to reading a fourth-century document like this, but if you pick up a good translation of it, this will help immensely (I read the Oxford World’s Classic printing translated by Henry Chadwick, and it was excellent). Also the last two or three chapters are quite philosophical in their approach to the topic of time, so be aware of that as well.

Aside from these cautions, “Pick up and read, pick up and read!”

For His Glory,
Jeremy Vanatta

Essential Things or Not: Do All to the Glory of God

Written by Jeremy Vanatta on November 22, 2010. Posted in The Gospel, Theology. 4 Comments

Perhaps one of the greatest struggles for followers of Jesus Christ is the very real tension between essential and less-essential matters within Christianity. If the The Threshing Floor is going to be of any use to anyone (not the least of which, me), then we must bear in mind that some wheat kernels that fall to the ground are less essential than others. When we speak of essential matters, most Christians are referring to the most fundamental truths of Christianity. Truths that would render Christianity quite unremarkable and quite impotent if they were ignored or adjusted.

What are some of these essential truths (also referred to as core or fundamental truths)? To name only a few, we should mention: the sovereignty and holiness of God; the sinfulness of man; the virgin conception of Jesus, His substitutionary atonement and bodily resurrection; His Second Coming; justification of the sinner by faith in Christ alone; and the sanctification of all those who are genuinely His.

What, then, are some of the less-essential truths (also known as non-core or secondary truths)? Again to name only a few, we should mention: Sabbath-keeping; frequency of Lord Supper observance; food choices; clothing choices; alcohol consumption; tattoos; styles of music; speaking in tongues; and the list could go on and on.

On all of the essential truths, Christians must be inflexible and vigilant as the assaults of the enemy are relentless here. We can in no way deny these truths without denying the very core of Christianity itself. But what should Christians do with the less-essential truths of Christianity? Paul’s instructions to the Corinthians can be especially helpful here.

In 1 Corinthians 10:23-33, Paul writes about the less-essential issue of meat that has been sacrificed to idols. Should a Christian eat or not? Many believers would immediately answer, “No way! Don’t eat it!” But Paul instructs us differently. He actually says, “Eat” (v.25), although we should be able to answer “Yes!” to at least two questions:
1) Is it helpful to my neighbor? (1 Cor.10:23-24; Rom.14:13-19)
2) Does it bring glory to God? (1 Cor.10:31)

If the answer to either question is no, then the Christian must not partake. If, however, the Christian’s conscience is clear on these two points, then he may proceed, all to the glory of God. I pray this helps us in at least some small way to navigate the often confusing maze of truth.